Black and White Bunny #3 by Sarah Lucas, 1997
"Lucas exhibited these three black and white photographs as part of her installation at Sadie Coles HQ, London in 1997, entitled Bunny Gets Snookered (see Tate T07437). A series of eight ‘bunny girls’ made from stuffed tights, each wearing stockings the eight colours of snooker balls, sat on a variety of office chairs arranged around and on top of a snooker table in the gallery space. The photographs were hung on the adjacent wall, suggesting further possible readings of the sculptures. The installation as a whole provided a typical Lucas-style joking subversion of (male) objectification of the female body, as it appears in the tradition of surrealism, by rendering that object of desire undesirable and ridiculous. However, the photographs, with their formal beauty, hint at issues both more transcendent and more disturbing. The bunnies here (the three photographs seem to be of the same bunny) sit in the characteristic Lucas splay-legged pose, illuminated by sunlight coming in through a window which renders them beautiful rather than merely abject. Distanced from the limp and veiny physicality of the sculptures through the medium of black and white photography, the form Lucas has created by stuffing a pair of tights becomes more aesthetically attractive and subtly suggestive. The slapstick humour of the sculptures has been overlaid by a dreamy quality of light and almost-poetic atmosphere, with violation and abuse a dark undercurrent rather than an obvious theme.
Lucas has increasingly combined objects and elements from her sculptures with photographic representations of herself (and sometimes parts of an anonymous male body). Here the presence of the cloaked human figure (of indeterminate gender) in the background of the picture, who reveals only a portion of leg, dislocates the viewer’s imaginary connection of the sculpture with the human. By juxtaposing a real body with her sculpture which mimics a body, Lucas opens further ambiguities in the dynamics of (sexual) objectification and desire.”
— Elizabeth Manchester, August 2000 (from Tate)

Black and White Bunny #3 by Sarah Lucas, 1997

"Lucas exhibited these three black and white photographs as part of her installation at Sadie Coles HQ, London in 1997, entitled Bunny Gets Snookered (see Tate T07437). A series of eight ‘bunny girls’ made from stuffed tights, each wearing stockings the eight colours of snooker balls, sat on a variety of office chairs arranged around and on top of a snooker table in the gallery space. The photographs were hung on the adjacent wall, suggesting further possible readings of the sculptures. The installation as a whole provided a typical Lucas-style joking subversion of (male) objectification of the female body, as it appears in the tradition of surrealism, by rendering that object of desire undesirable and ridiculous. However, the photographs, with their formal beauty, hint at issues both more transcendent and more disturbing. The bunnies here (the three photographs seem to be of the same bunny) sit in the characteristic Lucas splay-legged pose, illuminated by sunlight coming in through a window which renders them beautiful rather than merely abject. Distanced from the limp and veiny physicality of the sculptures through the medium of black and white photography, the form Lucas has created by stuffing a pair of tights becomes more aesthetically attractive and subtly suggestive. The slapstick humour of the sculptures has been overlaid by a dreamy quality of light and almost-poetic atmosphere, with violation and abuse a dark undercurrent rather than an obvious theme.

Lucas has increasingly combined objects and elements from her sculptures with photographic representations of herself (and sometimes parts of an anonymous male body). Here the presence of the cloaked human figure (of indeterminate gender) in the background of the picture, who reveals only a portion of leg, dislocates the viewer’s imaginary connection of the sculpture with the human. By juxtaposing a real body with her sculpture which mimics a body, Lucas opens further ambiguities in the dynamics of (sexual) objectification and desire.”

— Elizabeth Manchester, August 2000 (from Tate)



114 notes
  1. 10andahalf reblogged this from thesageofabsurd
  2. thesageofabsurd reblogged this from sophienatashabrown
  3. euthymic reblogged this from omnivoxy
  4. sterbend reblogged this from omnivoxy
  5. omnivoxy reblogged this from reptaculo
  6. just-man reblogged this from b-l-a-c-k-humor
  7. b-l-a-c-k-humor reblogged this from reptaculo
  8. bellybooo reblogged this from reptaculo
  9. reptaculo reblogged this from foxesinbreeches
  10. penguinist reblogged this from nicoonmars
  11. nicoonmars reblogged this from foxesinbreeches
  12. sophienatashabrown reblogged this from foxesinbreeches
  13. ateliersdorf reblogged this from turn-the-lights-out
  14. sol-psych reblogged this from foxesinbreeches
  15. laviedanscesyeux reblogged this from living-inthe-past
  16. living-inthe-past reblogged this from hediondo
  17. neogrigio reblogged this from turn-the-lights-out
  18. soeasilyinfluenced reblogged this from lsd137
  19. jonginsmissingsocks reblogged this from 3984282232
  20. veryquietlyshout reblogged this from foxesinbreeches
  21. puffncorn reblogged this from praeteriti
  22. sadomasochistic-rites reblogged this from lsd137
  23. miserabledarkness reblogged this from hediondo
  24. praeteriti reblogged this from agneslestrange
  25. accioseptember reblogged this from po-rafael
  26. turn-the-lights-out reblogged this from 3984282232